UNX vs. CRMG
UNX (Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
UNX vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNX achieves a -73.66% return, which is significantly lower than CRMG's -64.33% return.
UNX
- 1D
- -7.33%
- 1M
- 12.26%
- 6M
- -73.09%
- YTD
- -73.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- 6.77%
- 1M
- 10.88%
- 6M
- -53.43%
- YTD
- -64.33%
- 1Y
- -65.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNX vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UNX Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF | -73.66% | -21.32% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -64.33% | 12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNX and CRMG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNX vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
UNX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
UNX vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF (UNX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNX vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNX drawdown since its inception was -92.59%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNX and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.59% | -79.83% | -12.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -75.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.38% | -73.90% | -5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -41.04% | -17.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 45.39% | — |
Volatility
UNX vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 64.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 151.37% | 77.97% | +73.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.37% | 75.77% | +75.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 151.37% | 75.77% | +75.60% |
UNX vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNX vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither UNX nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UNX and CRMG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for UNX.
UNX and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for UNX and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for UNX and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer