UNX vs. CLSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

UNX (Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF) and CLSX (Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

UNX vs. CLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF (UNX) and Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNX achieves a -71.36% return, which is significantly lower than CLSX's -0.80% return.

UNX

• 1D: -9.70%
• 1M: 14.25%
• 6M: -23.99%
• YTD: -71.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CLSX

• 1D: -11.36%
• 1M: 4.82%
• 6M: -21.18%
• YTD: -0.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF	$5.70M	$5.94M	$6.31M
UNX Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF	$95.61K	$103.32K	$213.47K

UNX vs. CLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UNX Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF	-71.36%	-21.32%
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF	-0.80%	-35.55%

Correlation

The correlation between UNX and CLSX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

UNX vs. CLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF (UNX) and Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

UNX vs. CLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNX drawdown since its inception was -92.59%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSX drawdown of -93.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNX and CLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UNX	CLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.59%	-93.16%	+0.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.59%	-85.94%	+8.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.10%	-71.21%	+12.11%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UNX	CLSX	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	149.49%	194.93%	-45.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	149.49%	194.93%	-45.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	149.49%	194.93%	-45.44%

UNX vs. CLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UNX and CLSX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

UNX vs. CLSX - Dividend Comparison

Neither UNX nor CLSX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UNX and CLSX in my portfolio?

UNX and CLSX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UNX or CLSX?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UNX or CLSX?

UNX and CLSX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UNX or CLSX?

UNX and CLSX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.