PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNX vs. BMNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNX vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF (UNX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UNX having a -74.21% return and BMNG slightly lower at -75.13%.


UNX

1D
-9.30%
1M
7.72%
YTD
-74.21%
6M
-75.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNG

1D
-12.21%
1M
-48.30%
YTD
-75.13%
6M
-85.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNX vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UNX
Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF
-74.21%15.23%
BMNG
Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF
-75.13%-81.37%

Correlation

The correlation between UNX and BMNG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNX vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF (UNX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UNX vs. BMNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNXBMNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.56

-0.52

-0.04

Drawdowns

UNX vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNX drawdown since its inception was -92.59%, roughly equal to the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNX and BMNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNXBMNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.59%

-95.36%

+2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.82%

-95.36%

+15.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.41%

-81.38%

+26.97%

Volatility

UNX vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNXBMNGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

159.27%

191.58%

-32.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

159.27%

191.58%

-32.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

159.27%

191.58%

-32.31%

UNX vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNX vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither UNX nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UNX and BMNG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for UNX.

UNX and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for UNX and 0.75% for BMNG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNX and BMNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer