UNL vs. RDVI
UNL (United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP) and RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UNL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Natural Gas, while RDVI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UNL returned -17.95%/yr vs 20.19%/yr for RDVI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RDVI.
Performance
UNL vs. RDVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNL achieves a -13.41% return, which is significantly lower than RDVI's 13.37% return.
UNL
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- -13.41%
- 6M
- -15.14%
- 1Y
- -30.69%
- 3Y*
- -17.95%
- 5Y*
- -7.73%
- 10Y*
- -4.56%
RDVI
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- 13.37%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNL vs. RDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | -13.41% | -9.67% | -4.78% | -50.20% | -14.75% |
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 13.37% | 17.93% | 14.56% | 18.63% | 8.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNL and RDVI is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022 | 0.03 |
The correlation between UNL and RDVI shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNL vs. RDVI — Risk / Return Rank
UNL
RDVI
UNL vs. RDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) and FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNL | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.36 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 3.36 | -4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 14.17 | -15.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNL vs. RDVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNL drawdown since its inception was -89.00%, which is greater than RDVI's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNL and RDVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNL | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.00% | -18.35% | -70.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.43% | -8.48% | -23.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.16% | -18.35% | -29.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.68% | -1.27% | -87.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.39% | -3.14% | -70.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.45% | 2.01% | +18.44% |
Volatility
UNL vs. RDVI - Volatility Comparison
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) at 4.92%. This indicates that UNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNL | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 4.92% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.37% | 11.11% | +19.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.76% | 13.82% | +21.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.76% | 16.95% | +24.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.86% | 16.95% | +16.91% |
UNL vs. RDVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNL vs. RDVI - Dividend Comparison
UNL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 7.66% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% |
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNL and RDVI have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNL has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to RDVI (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNL dropped -89.00% vs RDVI's -18.35%.
On 3-year performance, RDVI leads with 20.19% vs -17.95% for UNL. On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RDVI has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 20.19% return vs -17.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for UNL.
RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.66%, compared with 0.00% for UNL.
UNL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while RDVI is Derivative Income. UNL tracks 12 Month Natural Gas, while RDVI tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for UNL and 0.75% for RDVI.
RDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNL and RDVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer