UNL vs. KJUL
UNL (United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP) and KJUL (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - UNL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Natural Gas, while KJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares Russell 2000 ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UNL returned -9.87%/yr vs 5.25%/yr for KJUL. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KJUL.
Performance
UNL vs. KJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNL achieves a -18.29% return, which is significantly lower than KJUL's 5.97% return.
UNL
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -10.40%
- YTD
- -18.29%
- 1Y
- -30.69%
- 3Y*
- -18.45%
- 5Y*
- -9.87%
- 10Y*
- -5.23%
KJUL
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- —
UNL vs. KJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | -18.29% | -9.67% | -4.78% | -50.20% | 47.01% | 54.42% | 0.13% |
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July | 5.97% | 7.70% | 8.69% | 11.78% | -8.44% | 2.51% | 10.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNL and KJUL is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020 | 0.01 |
The correlation between UNL and KJUL shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.02 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNL vs. KJUL — Risk / Return Rank
UNL
KJUL
UNL vs. KJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNL | KJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.37 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 4.01 | -4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | 15.56 | -17.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNL vs. KJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNL drawdown since its inception was -89.32%, which is greater than KJUL's maximum drawdown of -16.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNL and KJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNL | KJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.32% | -16.69% | -72.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.78% | -3.42% | -29.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.67% | -14.45% | -35.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.75% | -16.69% | -62.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.32% | -1.11% | -88.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.43% | -3.94% | -69.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.65% | 0.88% | +18.77% |
Volatility
UNL vs. KJUL - Volatility Comparison
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) at 1.25%. This indicates that UNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNL | KJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 1.25% | +4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.30% | 4.63% | +24.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.19% | 7.42% | +27.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.75% | 12.30% | +29.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.84% | 11.58% | +22.26% |
UNL vs. KJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than KJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNL vs. KJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither UNL nor KJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UNL and KJUL have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNL has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to KJUL (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNL dropped -89.32% vs KJUL's -16.69%.
On 5-year performance, KJUL leads with 5.25% vs -9.87% for UNL. On fees, KJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KJUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KJUL has performed better with a 5.25% return vs -9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for UNL.
UNL and KJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
UNL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while KJUL is Defined Outcome. UNL tracks 12 Month Natural Gas, while KJUL tracks iShares Russell 2000 ETF. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for UNL and 0.79% for KJUL.
KJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNL and KJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer