UNHW vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

UNHW vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNHW achieves a 22.06% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 552.98% return.

UNHW

• 1D: 6.07%
• 1M: 10.36%
• YTD: 22.06%
• 6M: 20.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 552.98%
• 6M: 433.74%
• 1Y: 1,596.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHW vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	22.06%	-3.02%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	552.98%	-30.40%

Correlation

The correlation between UNHW and INTW is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025	0.18

UNHW vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UNHW	INTW
Healthcare	33.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

UNHW vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 97
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNHW vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UNHW	INTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	3.33	-2.52

Drawdowns

UNHW vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHW drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHW and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	UNHW	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.28%	-60.58%	+28.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-27.77%	+26.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.40%	-30.06%	+17.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	21.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UNHW	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	42.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	110.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.32%	143.34%	-93.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.32%	145.01%	-94.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.32%	145.01%	-94.69%

UNHW vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UNHW vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.34%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	16.34%	2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UNHW and INTW in my portfolio?

UNHW and INTW have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UNHW or INTW?

On fees, UNHW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UNHW or INTW?

UNHW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UNHW or INTW?

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 16.34%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between UNHW and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UNHW and 1.50% for INTW.