PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNHW vs. GLWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNHW vs. GLWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UNHW

1D
6.07%
1M
10.36%
YTD
22.06%
6M
20.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLWG

1D
-2.81%
1M
39.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHW vs. GLWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UNHW and GLWG is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNHW vs. GLWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UNHW vs. GLWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNHWGLWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

7.40

-6.59

Drawdowns

UNHW vs. GLWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHW drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, which is greater than GLWG's maximum drawdown of -29.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHW and GLWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNHWGLWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.28%

-29.53%

-2.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-12.84%

+11.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-10.74%

-1.66%

Volatility

UNHW vs. GLWG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNHWGLWGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.32%

150.03%

-99.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.32%

150.03%

-99.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.32%

150.03%

-99.71%

UNHW vs. GLWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GLWG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNHW vs. GLWG - Dividend Comparison

UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.34%, while GLWG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
GLWG
Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
16.34%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNHW and GLWG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 16.34%, compared with 0.00% for GLWG.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UNHW and 0.75% for GLWG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNHW and GLWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer