PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNHW vs. DVXV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNHW vs. DVXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNHW achieves a 22.06% return, which is significantly higher than DVXV's -2.27% return.


UNHW

1D
6.07%
1M
10.36%
YTD
22.06%
6M
20.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DVXV

1D
4.25%
1M
6.21%
YTD
-2.27%
6M
-1.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHW vs. DVXV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UNHW and DVXV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNHW vs. DVXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UNHW vs. DVXV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNHWDVXVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.00

-0.19

Drawdowns

UNHW vs. DVXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHW drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, which is greater than DVXV's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHW and DVXV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNHWDVXVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.28%

-14.36%

-17.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-6.92%

+5.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-4.80%

-7.60%

Volatility

UNHW vs. DVXV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNHWDVXVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.32%

21.75%

+28.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.32%

21.75%

+28.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.32%

21.75%

+28.57%

UNHW vs. DVXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DVXV's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNHW vs. DVXV - Dividend Comparison

UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.34%, while DVXV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


UNHW and DVXV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DVXV is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DVXV is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 16.34%, compared with 0.00% for DVXV.

UNHW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DVXV is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UNHW and 0.89% for DVXV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNHW and DVXV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer