PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVXV vs. XBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVXV vs. XBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVXV achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than XBI's 20.69% return.


DVXV

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.06%
6M
5.03%
YTD
4.89%
1Y
33.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.57%

XBI

1D
-2.94%
1M
-8.38%
6M
17.96%
YTD
20.69%
1Y
71.86%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
9.00%
ALL TIME*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.42K$1.10K$2.54K
$1.17B$1.34B$1.30B

DVXV vs. XBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DVXV
WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF
4.89%21.27%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
20.69%41.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DVXV and XBI is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVXV vs. XBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DVXV
DVXV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DVXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVXV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DVXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVXV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XBI
XBI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBI Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DVXV vs. XBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DVXVXBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.42

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

6.92

-4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.60

19.52

-13.92

DVXV vs. XBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVXV Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the XBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVXV and XBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DVXV vs. XBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVXV drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum XBI drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXV and XBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVXVXBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-63.89%

+49.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.36%

-10.51%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-14.95%

+12.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-20.87%

+16.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

3.72%

+2.44%

Volatility

DVXV vs. XBI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) is 5.81%, while SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that DVXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVXVXBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

8.27%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

21.50%

-6.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.61%

26.97%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

32.32%

-10.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

31.93%

-10.51%

DVXV vs. XBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVXV has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than XBI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVXV vs. XBI - Dividend Comparison

DVXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVXV
WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
0.39%0.37%0.15%0.02%0.00%0.04%0.20%0.00%0.28%0.24%0.26%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVXV and XBI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XBI has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to DVXV (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVXV dropped -14.36% vs XBI's -63.89%.

On 1-year performance, XBI leads with 71.86% vs 33.47% for DVXV. On fees, XBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DVXV has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XBI has performed better with a 71.86% return vs 33.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXV.

XBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for DVXV.

DVXV tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index, while XBI tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXV and 0.35% for XBI.

XBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVXV and XBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer