PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNHU vs. IBHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNHU vs. IBHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UNHU

1D
-1.75%
1M
8.26%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBHF

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.50%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHU vs. IBHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UNHU and IBHF is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2026

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNHU vs. IBHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNHU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IBHF
IBHF Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IBHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHF Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNHU vs. IBHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UNHUIBHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.58

UNHU vs. IBHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNHU vs. IBHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHU drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, roughly equal to the maximum IBHF drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHU and IBHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNHUIBHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-11.19%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-0.36%

-3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-1.78%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

Volatility

UNHU vs. IBHF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNHUIBHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.96%

1.91%

+62.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.96%

5.79%

+58.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.96%

5.63%

+58.33%

UNHU vs. IBHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHF's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNHU vs. IBHF - Dividend Comparison

UNHU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBHF
iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.53%6.73%7.17%7.33%6.01%4.55%0.61%
UNHU
Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNHU and IBHF have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBHF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBHF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.

IBHF has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 0.00% for UNHU.

UNHU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBHF is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UNHU and 0.35% for IBHF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNHU and IBHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer