UNHU vs. BEG
UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.
Performance
UNHU vs. BEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UNHU
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 8.26%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEG
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 667.79%
- 6M
- 579.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNHU vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 117.56% |
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 259.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNHU and BEG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2026 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNHU vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNHU vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNHU drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum BEG drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHU and BEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNHU | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -59.85% | +48.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.60% | -12.65% | +9.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -16.70% | +13.90% |
Volatility
UNHU vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNHU | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.96% | 212.09% | -148.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.96% | 212.09% | -148.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.96% | 212.09% | -148.13% |
UNHU vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNHU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNHU vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison
Neither UNHU nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UNHU and BEG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.
UNHU and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UNHU and 0.75% for BEG.
Find the right allocation for UNHU and BEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer