UNHG vs. VRTL

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

UNHG (Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. UNHG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.

Performance

UNHG vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNHG achieves a 41.87% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 128.77% return.

UNHG

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 11.57%
• 6M: 42.55%
• YTD: 41.87%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRTL

• 1D: -3.21%
• 1M: -22.62%
• 6M: 96.25%
• YTD: 128.77%
• 1Y: 187.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHG vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF	41.87%	23.87%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	128.77%	36.18%

Correlation

The correlation between UNHG and VRTL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025	-0.00

Return for Risk

UNHG vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNHG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VRTL

VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 67
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNHG vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UNHG	VRTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.53	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.38	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.97	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.35	—

Drawdowns

UNHG vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHG drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, smaller than the maximum VRTL drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHG and VRTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	UNHG	VRTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.00%	-60.58%	+3.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-47.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.97%	-47.48%	+44.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.17%	-17.08%	-3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UNHG	VRTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	48.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	95.51%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.18%	123.18%	-44.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.18%	127.36%	-48.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.18%	127.36%	-48.18%

UNHG vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UNHG vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison

UNHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, while VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF	7.97%	11.30%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UNHG and VRTL in my portfolio?

UNHG and VRTL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UNHG or VRTL?

On fees, UNHG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UNHG or VRTL?

UNHG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UNHG or VRTL?

UNHG has the higher dividend yield at 7.97%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.

What is the main difference between UNHG and VRTL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UNHG and 1.50% for VRTL.