UNHG vs. VRTL
UNHG (Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.
Performance
UNHG vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNHG achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 230.54% return.
UNHG
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRTL
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 230.54%
- 6M
- 160.92%
- 1Y
- 442.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNHG vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF | 13.04% | 21.72% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 230.54% | 37.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNHG and VRTL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNHG vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank
UNHG
VRTL
UNHG vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNHG | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 3.29 | -2.75 |
Drawdowns
UNHG vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNHG drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, smaller than the maximum VRTL drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHG and VRTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNHG | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.00% | -60.58% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.81% | -24.11% | +11.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.70% | -15.16% | -7.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.53% | — |
Volatility
UNHG vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNHG | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 33.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 87.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.25% | 114.32% | -32.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.25% | 124.39% | -42.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.25% | 124.39% | -42.14% |
UNHG vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNHG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNHG vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison
UNHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, while VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF | 10.00% | 11.30% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNHG and VRTL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UNHG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UNHG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.
UNHG has the higher dividend yield at 10.00%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UNHG and 1.50% for VRTL.
Find the right allocation for UNHG and VRTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer