UNHG vs. METE.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UNHG (Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF) and METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - UNHG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while METE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for METE.TO.

Performance

UNHG vs. METE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

UNHG is traded in USD, while METE.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the METE.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNHG achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than METE.TO's -5.73% return.

UNHG

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 7.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METE.TO

• 1D: 5.05%
• 1M: 2.59%
• YTD: -5.73%
• 6M: -2.48%
• 1Y: -7.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHG vs. METE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF	13.04%	21.72%
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units	-5.73%	-7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between UNHG and METE.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

UNHG vs. METE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METE.TO

METE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8
METE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
METE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNHG vs. METE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UNHG	METE.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	-0.03	+0.57

Drawdowns

UNHG vs. METE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHG drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, which is greater than METE.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHG and METE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UNHG	METE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.00%	-38.63%	-18.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-36.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.81%	-22.79%	+9.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.70%	-15.34%	-7.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UNHG	METE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.78%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.25%	37.12%	+45.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.25%	42.60%	+39.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.25%	42.60%	+39.65%

UNHG vs. METE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than METE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

UNHG vs. METE.TO - Dividend Comparison

UNHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, less than METE.TO's 25.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units	25.77%	21.31%
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF	10.00%	11.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UNHG and METE.TO in my portfolio?

UNHG and METE.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UNHG or METE.TO?

On fees, METE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UNHG or METE.TO?

METE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UNHG.

What is the main difference between UNHG and METE.TO?

UNHG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while METE.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Harvest Portfolios Group. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UNHG and 0.40% for METE.TO.