UNHG vs. LQQ.PA
UNHG (Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF) and LQQ.PA (Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage) are both exchange-traded funds - UNHG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while LQQ.PA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. UNHG is actively managed, while LQQ.PA is passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LQQ.PA.
Performance
UNHG vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UNHG is traded in USD, while LQQ.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LQQ.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNHG achieves a 44.30% return, which is significantly lower than LQQ.PA's 25,608.77% return.
UNHG
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 36.65%
- YTD
- 44.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQQ.PA
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 19,506.49%
- 6M
- 24,968.92%
- YTD
- 25,608.77%
- 1Y
- 30,886.74%
- 3Y*
- 714.44%
- 5Y*
- 246.05%
- 10Y*
- 128.72%
UNHG vs. LQQ.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF | 44.30% | 23.87% |
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | 25,608.77% | 16.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNHG and LQQ.PA is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNHG vs. LQQ.PA — Risk / Return Rank
UNHG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQQ.PA
UNHG vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNHG | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 109.92 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1,293.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4,184.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNHG vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNHG drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, smaller than the maximum LQQ.PA drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHG and LQQ.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNHG | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.00% | -78.94% | +21.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -2.46% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.43% | -16.62% | -3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.08% | — |
Volatility
UNHG vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNHG | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 531.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 531.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.68% | 20,066.92% | -19,987.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.68% | 8,967.26% | -8,887.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.68% | 6,334.63% | -6,254.95% |
UNHG vs. LQQ.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNHG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LQQ.PA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNHG vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison
UNHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, while LQQ.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF | 7.83% | 11.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNHG and LQQ.PA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQQ.PA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQQ.PA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UNHG.
UNHG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while LQQ.PA is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UNHG and 0.60% for LQQ.PA.
Find the right allocation for UNHG and LQQ.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer