UNHG vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UNHG (Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

UNHG vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNHG achieves a 33.13% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.

UNHG

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 10.50%
• YTD: 33.13%
• 6M: 37.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: -12.49%
• 1M: 12.21%
• YTD: 750.22%
• 6M: 775.58%
• 1Y: 1,964.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHG vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF	33.13%	23.87%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	750.22%	105.46%

Correlation

The correlation between UNHG and INTW is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

UNHG vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNHG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNHG vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UNHG	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	13.25	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.13	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.65	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	40.32	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	91.49	—

Drawdowns

UNHG vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHG drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHG and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	UNHG	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.00%	-60.58%	+3.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.32%	-12.49%	+11.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.46%	-29.66%	+8.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	21.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UNHG	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	55.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	119.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.85%	150.14%	-69.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.85%	148.88%	-68.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.85%	148.88%	-68.03%

UNHG vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UNHG vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

UNHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
UNHG Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF	8.49%	11.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UNHG and INTW in my portfolio?

UNHG and INTW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UNHG or INTW?

On fees, UNHG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UNHG or INTW?

UNHG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UNHG or INTW?

UNHG has the higher dividend yield at 8.49%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between UNHG and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UNHG and 1.50% for INTW.