PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNH vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UNH vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNH achieves a 26.20% return, which is significantly higher than T's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, UNH has outperformed T with an annualized return of 13.41%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.11% annualized return.


UNH

1D
1.19%
1M
4.96%
YTD
26.20%
6M
22.13%
1Y
35.57%
3Y*
-1.61%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
13.41%

T

1D
-1.23%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
-4.15%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-13.78%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNH vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
26.20%-33.14%-2.41%0.80%6.94%45.20%21.25%20.00%14.52%39.83%
T
AT&T Inc.
-4.15%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between UNH and T is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.20

The correlation between UNH and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

UNH:

$13.23

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

UNH:

31.07

T:

7.65

PS Ratio

UNH:

0.83

T:

1.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

UNH:

$449.71B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UNH:

$84.55B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

UNH:

$22.99B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNH vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNH
UNH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNH Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
UNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNH vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UNHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.91

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

-0.63

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.71

-1.29

+4.00

UNH vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNH Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNH and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNH vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNH drawdown since its inception was -74.37%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNH and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.37%

-64.15%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.96%

-21.87%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.39%

-21.87%

-39.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.39%

-32.01%

-29.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.39%

-42.35%

-19.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.47%

-19.13%

-12.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.77%

-15.72%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.18%

10.70%

+2.48%

Volatility

UNH vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) is 7.65%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that UNH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

8.27%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.78%

17.84%

+12.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.08%

22.21%

+17.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.89%

24.03%

+7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.19%

23.74%

+6.45%

Dividends

UNH vs. T - Dividend Comparison

UNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than T's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
T
AT&T Inc.
4.77%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
2.72%2.64%1.62%1.38%1.21%1.12%1.38%1.41%1.38%1.30%1.48%1.59%

Financials

UNH vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
111.72B
33.47B
(UNH) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UNH and T have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to UNH (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNH dropped -74.37% vs T's -64.15%.

UNH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNH and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer