UNG vs. ENB
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB).
UNG is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Apr 18, 2007.
Performance
UNG vs. ENB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UNG vs. ENB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -4.32% | -27.07% | -17.11% | -64.04% | 12.89% | 35.76% | -45.43% | -31.77% | 5.96% | -37.58% |
ENB Enbridge Inc. | 14.71% | 19.51% | 26.35% | -1.13% | 6.46% | 30.83% | -13.60% | 36.05% | -15.53% | -2.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -4.32% return, which is significantly lower than ENB's 14.71% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed ENB with an annualized return of -19.74%, while ENB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.
UNG
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- -4.32%
- 6M
- -10.25%
- 1Y
- -45.72%
- 3Y*
- -24.96%
- 5Y*
- -21.28%
- 10Y*
- -19.74%
ENB
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 14.71%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNG vs. ENB — Risk / Return Rank
UNG
ENB
UNG vs. ENB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNG | ENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | 1.73 | -2.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | 2.30 | -3.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.31 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 3.08 | -3.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 7.65 | -8.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNG | ENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | 1.73 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.83 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.36 | 0.42 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 0.52 | -1.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between UNG and ENB is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UNG vs. ENB - Dividend Comparison
UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENB Enbridge Inc. | 5.07% | 5.66% | 6.28% | 7.31% | 6.80% | 6.85% | 7.55% | 5.58% | 6.68% | 4.71% | 4.13% | 4.71% |
Drawdowns
UNG vs. ENB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than ENB's maximum drawdown of -46.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and ENB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNG | ENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.87% | -46.35% | -53.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.53% | -9.37% | -43.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.42% | -28.32% | -64.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.49% | -44.07% | -49.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.86% | -0.81% | -99.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.87% | -10.88% | -78.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.10% | 3.78% | +32.32% |
Volatility
UNG vs. ENB - Volatility Comparison
United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 14.68% compared to Enbridge Inc. (ENB) at 3.51%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UNG | ENB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.68% | 3.51% | +11.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.10% | 11.69% | +42.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.87% | 17.09% | +46.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.90% | 18.49% | +45.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.87% | 24.41% | +30.46% |