PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMMGX vs. LSSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMMGX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UMMGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LSSAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.22%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
2.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMMGX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMMGX
Columbia Bond Fund
0.03%8.03%2.06%6.73%-15.66%-0.79%9.10%9.23%-0.50%3.73%
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
1.24%8.32%3.94%7.01%-11.82%0.64%4.68%6.81%2.48%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between UMMGX and LSSAX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2006

0.80

The correlation between UMMGX and LSSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMMGX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMMGX

LSSAX
LSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMMGX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UMMGX vs. LSSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMMGXLSSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

Drawdowns

UMMGX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMMGXLSSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

Volatility

UMMGX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMMGXLSSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

UMMGX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMMGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMMGX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison

UMMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than LSSAX's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
4.34%4.23%4.54%5.65%6.47%6.38%5.95%5.48%5.62%5.42%5.12%5.20%
UMMGX
Columbia Bond Fund
3.41%4.20%3.70%3.73%2.73%1.76%4.77%4.21%2.71%1.88%4.66%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMMGX and LSSAX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMMGX and LSSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer