UMMGX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
UMMGX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jan 9, 1986. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
UMMGX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UMMGX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund | 0.03% | 8.03% | 2.06% | 6.73% | -15.66% | -0.79% | 9.10% | 9.23% | -0.50% | 3.73% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -6.10% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMMGX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -6.10% return. Over the past 10 years, UMMGX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 2.07%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.80% annualized return.
UMMGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
CTCAX
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 20.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMMGX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMMGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UMMGX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
UMMGX
CTCAX
UMMGX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UMMGX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.84 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.30 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 8.07 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UMMGX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.50 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.84 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.71 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between UMMGX and CTCAX is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
UMMGX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
UMMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than CTCAX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund | 4.08% | 4.20% | 3.70% | 3.73% | 2.73% | 1.76% | 4.77% | 4.21% | 2.71% | 1.88% | 4.66% | 3.56% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.50% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
UMMGX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMMGX drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMMGX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMMGX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -61.04% | +40.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -14.43% | +11.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.86% | -39.55% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.86% | -39.55% | +18.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -10.51% | +7.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -10.75% | +8.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 4.12% | -3.25% |
Volatility
UMMGX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) is 1.05%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that UMMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UMMGX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 8.94% | -7.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | 16.85% | -14.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.43% | 27.31% | -22.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.31% | 25.88% | -19.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.18% | 24.70% | -19.52% |