PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMMA vs. ^IMXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UMMA vs. ^IMXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index (^IMXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UMMA vs. ^IMXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UMMA
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
5.89%26.65%4.67%18.84%-21.62%
^IMXL
Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index
-4.94%20.39%26.01%33.51%-23.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMMA achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly higher than ^IMXL's -4.94% return.


UMMA

1D
1.88%
1M
-7.52%
YTD
5.89%
6M
11.47%
1Y
32.44%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
10Y*

^IMXL

1D
1.49%
1M
-5.10%
YTD
-4.94%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMMA vs. ^IMXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMMA
UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

^IMXL
^IMXL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^IMXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IMXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IMXL Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
^IMXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IMXL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMMA vs. ^IMXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index (^IMXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMMA^IMXLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

1.13

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.12

1.69

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.11

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.69

4.60

+4.08

UMMA vs. ^IMXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the ^IMXL Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMMA and ^IMXL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMMA^IMXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.13

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.41

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between UMMA and ^IMXL is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

UMMA vs. ^IMXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMMA drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, smaller than the maximum ^IMXL drawdown of -48.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMMA and ^IMXL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UMMA^IMXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.17%

-48.36%

+14.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-11.76%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

-7.73%

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-10.87%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

2.74%

+1.03%

Volatility

UMMA vs. ^IMXL - Volatility Comparison

Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index (^IMXL) at 5.54%. This indicates that UMMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^IMXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UMMA^IMXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.33%

5.54%

+3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.21%

8.96%

+6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.99%

16.13%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

16.92%

+3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

16.64%

+3.60%