UMLGX vs. CTCAX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

UMLGX (Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund) and CTCAX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - UMLGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Columbia, while CTCAX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, UMLGX returned 13.09%/yr vs 24.45%/yr for CTCAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UMLGX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for CTCAX.

Performance

UMLGX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund (UMLGX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMLGX achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 26.55% return. Over the past 10 years, UMLGX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 13.09%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.45% annualized return.

UMLGX

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -2.65%
• 6M: 9.21%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 1Y: 12.75%
• 3Y*: 15.44%
• 5Y*: 5.12%
• 10Y*: 13.09%

CTCAX

• 1D: -3.15%
• 1M: -4.17%
• 6M: 26.55%
• YTD: 26.55%
• 1Y: 44.58%
• 3Y*: 32.41%
• 5Y*: 18.01%
• 10Y*: 24.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMLGX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UMLGX Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund	9.21%	10.64%	15.91%	39.46%	-32.52%	9.30%	47.97%	38.23%	-12.56%	35.45%
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A	26.55%	24.78%	31.39%	56.46%	-34.81%	22.73%	49.46%	43.91%	-1.48%	42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between UMLGX and CTCAX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2002	0.90

The correlation between UMLGX and CTCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UMLGX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMLGX

UMLGX Risk / Return Rank: 13
UMLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
UMLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
UMLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
UMLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
UMLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CTCAX

CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMLGX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund (UMLGX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMLGX	CTCAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	1.90	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	2.41	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.33	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	3.21	-2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.36	11.23	-8.87

UMLGX vs. CTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMLGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the CTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMLGX and CTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMLGX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMLGX drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than CTCAX's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMLGX and CTCAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMLGX	CTCAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.05%	-61.04%	-12.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.42%	-14.43%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.90%	-26.67%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.79%	-39.55%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.79%	-39.55%	-4.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-4.17%	+1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.59%	-10.66%	-15.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	4.12%	+1.41%

Volatility

UMLGX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund (UMLGX) is 7.45%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 13.48%. This indicates that UMLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMLGX	CTCAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	13.48%	-6.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.06%	20.67%	-6.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.11%	24.46%	-7.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.85%	26.58%	-2.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.56%	25.09%	-1.53%

UMLGX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMLGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMLGX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison

UMLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.92%, more than CTCAX's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A	2.60%	3.29%	1.08%	2.36%	3.53%	4.15%	0.91%	2.55%	5.82%	3.52%	0.36%	1.80%
UMLGX Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund	11.92%	35.72%	18.08%	11.04%	14.23%	35.11%	24.47%	33.49%	13.61%	11.08%	13.27%	14.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMLGX and CTCAX in my portfolio?

UMLGX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMLGX or CTCAX?

CTCAX has higher volatility (13.48%) compared to UMLGX (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMLGX dropped -73.05% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.