PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMI vs. VFMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UMI vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UMI vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
18.78%5.11%42.97%14.60%20.78%20.97%-8.25%21.06%-9.03%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
2.90%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-1.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMI achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 2.90% return.


UMI

1D
-1.83%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
18.78%
6M
17.63%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
26.90%
5Y*
23.65%
10Y*

VFMV

1D
0.35%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
2.90%
6M
3.50%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UMI vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UMI vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMI
UMI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMI vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMIVFMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

0.63

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

0.94

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.80

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.13

3.69

+0.44

UMI vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMI and VFMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMIVFMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

0.63

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

0.80

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.66

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between UMI and VFMV is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

UMI vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than VFMV's 2.04% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
6.07%6.23%4.39%4.67%4.36%3.00%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
2.04%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%

Drawdowns

UMI vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMI drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMI and VFMV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UMIVFMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-33.64%

-14.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-9.63%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.05%

-15.41%

-4.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.39%

-4.26%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-3.69%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

2.09%

+2.38%

Volatility

UMI vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 3.43%. This indicates that UMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UMIVFMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

3.43%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

6.62%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.84%

12.28%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

11.77%

+8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.29%

14.34%

+8.95%