UMI vs. DVXE
UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) and DVXE (WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. UMI is actively managed, while DVXE is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UMI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for DVXE.
Performance
UMI vs. DVXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMI achieves a 24.37% return, which is significantly lower than DVXE's 32.67% return.
UMI
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 24.37%
- 6M
- 24.06%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 20.82%
- 10Y*
- —
DVXE
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -7.15%
- YTD
- 32.67%
- 6M
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMI vs. DVXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 24.37% | 4.10% |
DVXE WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF | 32.67% | 4.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMI and DVXE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMI vs. DVXE — Risk / Return Rank
UMI
DVXE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UMI vs. DVXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF (DVXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMI | DVXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMI vs. DVXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMI drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than DVXE's maximum drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMI and DVXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMI | DVXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.08% | -20.56% | -27.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -19.46% | +16.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -6.47% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | — | — |
Volatility
UMI vs. DVXE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMI | DVXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.36% | 31.08% | -16.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 31.08% | -11.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.15% | 31.08% | -7.93% |
UMI vs. DVXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXE's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
UMI vs. DVXE - Dividend Comparison
UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, while DVXE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXE WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 5.90% | 6.23% | 4.39% | 4.67% | 4.36% | 3.00% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.48% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMI and DVXE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UMI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UMI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXE.
UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 0.00% for DVXE.
They also come from different issuers: Wainwright, Inc. and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UMI and 0.89% for DVXE.
Find the right allocation for UMI and DVXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer