PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMI.BR vs. GNG.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UMI.BR vs. GNG.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Umicore SA (UMI.BR) and GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UMI.BR is traded in EUR, while GNG.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the GNG.AX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMI.BR achieves a 30.90% return, which is significantly lower than GNG.AX's 40.41% return. Over the past 10 years, UMI.BR has underperformed GNG.AX with an annualized return of 2.60%, while GNG.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.88% annualized return.


UMI.BR

1D
-0.95%
1M
4.67%
YTD
30.90%
6M
50.01%
1Y
127.93%
3Y*
-2.53%
5Y*
-11.72%
10Y*
2.60%

GNG.AX

1D
0.00%
1M
22.89%
YTD
40.41%
6M
45.70%
1Y
128.86%
3Y*
49.31%
5Y*
40.51%
10Y*
26.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMI.BR vs. GNG.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMI.BR
Umicore SA
30.90%85.26%-58.27%-25.60%-1.84%-7.70%-8.80%27.60%-10.27%50.96%
GNG.AX
GR Engineering Services Limited
40.41%81.95%18.23%14.79%5.24%88.03%63.10%-19.16%-24.24%3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between UMI.BR and GNG.AX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMI.BR vs. GNG.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMI.BR
UMI.BR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
UMI.BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMI.BR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GNG.AX
GNG.AX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GNG.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMI.BR vs. GNG.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Umicore SA (UMI.BR) and GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMI.BRGNG.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

4.51

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

12.03

-1.42

UMI.BR vs. GNG.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMI.BR Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the GNG.AX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMI.BR and GNG.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMI.BRGNG.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.77

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

1.09

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.64

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.31

-0.09

Drawdowns

UMI.BR vs. GNG.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMI.BR drawdown since its inception was -86.39%, which is greater than GNG.AX's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMI.BR and GNG.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMI.BRGNG.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.39%

-81.80%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.72%

-27.58%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.99%

-27.58%

-44.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.39%

-34.75%

-51.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.39%

-69.99%

-16.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.77%

-5.59%

-50.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.31%

-33.98%

+7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.00%

10.47%

+1.53%

Volatility

UMI.BR vs. GNG.AX - Volatility Comparison

Umicore SA (UMI.BR) has a higher volatility of 20.30% compared to GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX) at 12.21%. This indicates that UMI.BR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNG.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMI.BRGNG.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.30%

12.21%

+8.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.91%

34.98%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.55%

44.96%

+4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.73%

36.81%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.40%

41.89%

-5.49%

Dividends

UMI.BR vs. GNG.AX - Dividend Comparison

UMI.BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, which matches GNG.AX's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNG.AX
GR Engineering Services Limited
2.18%4.94%7.69%8.56%9.31%5.71%4.92%7.50%10.28%3.47%7.35%6.41%
UMI.BR
Umicore SA
2.19%1.40%6.92%2.77%2.33%2.10%0.64%1.79%2.08%2.48%4.80%5.17%

Financials

UMI.BR vs. GNG.AX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Umicore SA and GR Engineering Services Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. UMI.BR values in EUR, GNG.AX values in AUD

Frequently Asked Questions


UMI.BR and GNG.AX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMI.BR and GNG.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer