PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMDD vs. TECL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMDD vs. TECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 31.54% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 83.49% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has underperformed TECL with an annualized return of 11.46%, while TECL has yielded a comparatively higher 51.28% annualized return.


UMDD

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
31.54%
6M
30.82%
1Y
55.88%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*
11.46%

TECL

1D
6.30%
1M
11.53%
YTD
83.49%
6M
68.65%
1Y
192.14%
3Y*
69.70%
5Y*
37.52%
10Y*
51.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMDD vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
31.54%-2.57%19.68%27.21%-49.60%72.27%-17.30%78.90%-40.29%49.17%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
83.49%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and TECL is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.71

The correlation between UMDD and TECL shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UMDD vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UMDD
TECL

Industrials

13.4%
0.0%

Technology

9.0%
20.6%

Financial Services

7.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%

-

Healthcare

4.8%

-

Real Estate

3.9%

-

Energy

2.7%
0.0%

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.2%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Industrials

UMDD
13.4%
TECL
0.0%

Technology

UMDD
9.0%
TECL
20.6%

Financial Services

UMDD
7.1%
TECL

-

Consumer Cyclical

UMDD
5.1%
TECL

-

Healthcare

UMDD
4.8%
TECL

-

Real Estate

UMDD
3.9%
TECL

-

Energy

UMDD
2.7%
TECL
0.0%

Basic Materials

UMDD
2.6%
TECL

-

Consumer Defensive

UMDD
2.2%
TECL

-

Utilities

UMDD
1.6%
TECL

-

Communication Services

UMDD
0.5%
TECL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMDD vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDD vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMDDTECLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

4.15

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

11.82

-4.61

UMDD vs. TECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the TECL Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMDD and TECL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMDDTECLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.94

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.51

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.71

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.73

-0.42

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than TECL's maximum drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and TECL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMDDTECLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-77.96%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

-46.58%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.33%

-66.58%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.61%

-77.96%

+13.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.24%

-77.96%

-8.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.91%

-21.19%

+11.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.60%

-18.38%

-5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.78%

16.33%

-8.55%

Volatility

UMDD vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) is 12.43%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 32.17%. This indicates that UMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMDDTECLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.43%

32.17%

-19.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.70%

55.30%

-20.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.01%

65.89%

-18.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.96%

74.68%

-15.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.31%

72.68%

-10.37%

UMDD vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMDD vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than TECL's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
3.87%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%0.00%0.00%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
0.80%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMDD and TECL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECL has higher volatility (32.17%) compared to UMDD (12.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs TECL's -77.96%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 51.28% vs 11.46% for UMDD. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 12.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 51.28% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UMDD.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.80% for UMDD.

UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 0.91% for TECL.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMDD and TECL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer