UMDD vs. NTSD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UMDD is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.

Performance

UMDD vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UMDD

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 10.87%
• YTD: 37.59%
• 6M: 37.25%
• 1Y: 65.82%
• 3Y*: 25.91%
• 5Y*: 2.33%
• 10Y*: 11.97%

NTSD

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 7.13%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMDD vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	33.71%
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	17.91%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and NTSD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026	0.82

Return for Risk

UMDD vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDD

UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 44
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 37
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDD vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMDD	NTSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.51	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMDD	NTSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	5.08	-4.76

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and NTSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMDD	NTSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.24%	-5.20%	-81.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.77%	-1.11%	-4.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-0.84%	-22.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UMDD	NTSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.48%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.79%	24.28%	+22.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.91%	24.28%	+34.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.28%	24.28%	+38.00%

UMDD vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMDD vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	0.76%	1.00%	0.76%	0.19%	0.49%	0.06%	0.08%	0.64%	0.32%	0.00%	0.03%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMDD and NTSD in my portfolio?

UMDD and NTSD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UMDD or NTSD?

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMDD or NTSD?

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UMDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMDD or NTSD?

UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.

What is the main difference between UMDD and NTSD?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 0.35% for NTSD.