UMDD vs. LULG

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UMDD is passively managed, while LULG is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.

Performance

UMDD vs. LULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 43.81% return, which is significantly higher than LULG's -75.54% return.

UMDD

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: 6.56%
• YTD: 43.81%
• 6M: 35.22%
• 1Y: 70.44%
• 3Y*: 26.82%
• 5Y*: 3.33%
• 10Y*: 14.56%

LULG

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -25.41%
• YTD: -75.54%
• 6M: -76.28%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMDD vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	43.81%	7.01%
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF	-75.54%	55.59%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and LULG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

UMDD vs. LULG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDD

UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 52
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 59

LULG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDD vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMDD	LULG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.09	—	—

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than LULG's maximum drawdown of -79.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and LULG.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMDD	LULG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.24%	-79.88%	-6.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-77.35%	+75.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.54%	-37.21%	+13.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UMDD	LULG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.47%	88.29%	-40.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.95%	88.29%	-29.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.21%	88.29%	-26.08%

UMDD vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMDD vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	0.65%	1.00%	0.76%	0.19%	0.49%	0.06%	0.08%	0.64%	0.32%	0.00%	0.03%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMDD and LULG in my portfolio?

UMDD and LULG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UMDD or LULG?

On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMDD or LULG?

LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UMDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMDD or LULG?

UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.

What is the main difference between UMDD and LULG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 0.75% for LULG.