UMDD vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UMDD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMDD returned 11.80%/yr vs 10.89%/yr for DBO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

UMDD vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 38.92% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has outperformed DBO with an annualized return of 11.80%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.89% annualized return.

UMDD

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 7.76%
• YTD: 38.92%
• 6M: 36.59%
• 1Y: 68.09%
• 3Y*: 27.72%
• 5Y*: 2.53%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

DBO

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: -3.39%
• YTD: 79.84%
• 6M: 74.51%
• 1Y: 77.38%
• 3Y*: 20.83%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: 10.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMDD vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	38.92%	-2.57%	19.68%	27.21%	-49.60%	72.27%	-17.30%	78.90%	-40.29%	49.17%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	79.84%	-11.71%	7.85%	-4.44%	13.04%	60.74%	-20.99%	28.05%	-15.22%	4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and DBO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010	0.30

The correlation between UMDD and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UMDD vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UMDD	DBO
Industrials	13.6%	-
Technology	9.1%	-
Financial Services	7.5%	116.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	-
Healthcare	4.8%	-
Real Estate	4.1%	-
Energy	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	-
Utilities	1.6%	-
Communication Services	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

UMDD vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDD

UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 46
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 39
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 52

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDD vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMDD	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	2.25	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.85	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.36	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	4.28	-1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	8.69	+0.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMDD vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMDD and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMDD	DBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	2.25	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.48	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	0.34	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.02	+0.31

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, roughly equal to the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMDD	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.24%	-90.18%	+3.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.04%	-18.19%	-7.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.33%	-28.20%	-32.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.61%	-37.68%	-26.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.24%	-61.69%	-24.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.86%	-52.68%	+47.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-62.25%	+38.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.76%	8.94%	-1.18%

Volatility

UMDD vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) have volatilities of 13.04% and 12.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMDD	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.04%	12.79%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.22%	28.32%	+5.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.65%	34.58%	+12.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.91%	32.31%	+26.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.27%	31.79%	+30.48%

UMDD vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMDD vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than DBO's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.95%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	0.75%	1.00%	0.76%	0.19%	0.49%	0.06%	0.08%	0.64%	0.32%	0.00%	0.03%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMDD and DBO in my portfolio?

UMDD and DBO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMDD or DBO?

UMDD has higher volatility (13.04%) compared to DBO (12.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, UMDD or DBO?

On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 11.80% vs 10.89% for DBO. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DBO has been the lower-risk option at 12.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMDD or DBO?

Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMDD or DBO?

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UMDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMDD or DBO?

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.75% for UMDD.

What is the main difference between UMDD and DBO?

UMDD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UMDD and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.