PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMBMX vs. HRSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMBMX vs. HRSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) and Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMBMX achieves a 13.74% return, which is significantly lower than HRSCX's 18.28% return. Over the past 10 years, UMBMX has outperformed HRSCX with an annualized return of 12.89%, while HRSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.28% annualized return.


UMBMX

1D
0.14%
1M
0.84%
YTD
13.74%
6M
12.96%
1Y
26.73%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
12.89%

HRSCX

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.30%
YTD
18.28%
6M
16.32%
1Y
36.18%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
9.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMBMX vs. HRSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
13.74%15.46%22.93%12.73%-17.31%15.69%27.28%20.76%-9.83%24.04%
HRSCX
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund
18.28%11.26%12.85%14.06%-27.67%0.80%37.26%25.40%-10.92%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between UMBMX and HRSCX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006

0.90

The correlation between UMBMX and HRSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMBMX vs. HRSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMBMX
UMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
UMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

HRSCX
HRSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HRSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HRSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMBMX vs. HRSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) and Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMBMXHRSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.98

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.42

12.34

-0.92

UMBMX vs. HRSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMBMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the HRSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMBMX and HRSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMBMXHRSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.84

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.18

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.39

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.42

+0.16

Drawdowns

UMBMX vs. HRSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMBMX drawdown since its inception was -49.91%, smaller than the maximum HRSCX drawdown of -55.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBMX and HRSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMBMXHRSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.91%

-55.68%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-12.15%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-28.37%

+8.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-38.22%

+11.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.91%

-38.32%

+1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.80%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.10%

-11.50%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.93%

-0.61%

Volatility

UMBMX vs. HRSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) is 4.29%, while Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that UMBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMBMXHRSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

5.97%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

15.33%

-4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

19.77%

-5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

23.61%

-5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

23.97%

-4.86%

UMBMX vs. HRSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMBMX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HRSCX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMBMX vs. HRSCX - Dividend Comparison

UMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than HRSCX's 7.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRSCX
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund
7.12%8.42%22.56%9.37%38.95%40.00%18.51%6.62%26.17%8.10%0.06%7.03%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
9.05%10.29%15.75%0.17%4.21%11.54%2.40%0.74%8.09%8.38%2.39%8.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMBMX and HRSCX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRSCX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to UMBMX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMBMX dropped -49.91% vs HRSCX's -55.68%.

UMBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMBMX and HRSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer