PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMBMX vs. EISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMBMX vs. EISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) and Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund (EISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMBMX achieves a 13.74% return, which is significantly lower than EISIX's 22.79% return. Over the past 10 years, UMBMX has outperformed EISIX with an annualized return of 12.89%, while EISIX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.17% annualized return.


UMBMX

1D
0.14%
1M
0.84%
YTD
13.74%
6M
12.96%
1Y
26.73%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
12.89%

EISIX

1D
-0.84%
1M
8.49%
YTD
22.79%
6M
26.31%
1Y
48.29%
3Y*
29.02%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMBMX vs. EISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
13.74%15.46%22.93%12.73%-17.31%15.69%27.28%20.76%-9.83%24.04%
EISIX
Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund
22.79%39.31%14.86%20.02%-11.83%17.84%2.92%18.66%-17.86%27.57%

Correlation

The correlation between UMBMX and EISIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.74

The correlation between UMBMX and EISIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMBMX vs. EISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMBMX
UMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
UMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

EISIX
EISIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMBMX vs. EISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) and Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund (EISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMBMXEISIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.57

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.91

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.42

15.55

-4.13

UMBMX vs. EISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMBMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the EISIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMBMX and EISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMBMXEISIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

3.08

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.99

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.73

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.60

-0.02

Drawdowns

UMBMX vs. EISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMBMX drawdown since its inception was -49.91%, which is greater than EISIX's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMBMX and EISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMBMXEISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.91%

-39.30%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-12.54%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-13.38%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

-27.05%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.91%

-39.30%

+2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.84%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.10%

-7.47%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.15%

-0.83%

Volatility

UMBMX vs. EISIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) is 4.29%, while Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund (EISIX) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that UMBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMBMXEISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

5.90%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

13.69%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

15.94%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

16.16%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

16.69%

+2.42%

UMBMX vs. EISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMBMX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EISIX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMBMX vs. EISIX - Dividend Comparison

UMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than EISIX's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EISIX
Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund
2.44%3.00%3.83%2.95%0.87%1.81%1.09%2.39%1.81%1.36%2.31%0.77%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
9.05%10.29%15.75%0.17%4.21%11.54%2.40%0.74%8.09%8.38%2.39%8.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMBMX and EISIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EISIX has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to UMBMX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMBMX dropped -49.91% vs EISIX's -39.30%.

EISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMBMX and EISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer