PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMAY vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UMAY vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UMAY vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May
0.66%8.79%14.32%12.53%-9.21%5.25%7.38%
BAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
2.08%8.28%15.95%23.16%-7.04%12.58%13.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAY achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 2.08% return.


UMAY

1D
1.04%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.66%
6M
2.64%
1Y
9.98%
3Y*
11.16%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*

BAPR

1D
2.58%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.42%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UMAY vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UMAY and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

UMAY vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMAY
UMAY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
UMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAY vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMAYBAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.29

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

1.99

-0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.74

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.21

11.59

-4.37

UMAY vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAY and BAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMAYBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.29

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.88

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.75

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between UMAY and BAPR is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UMAY vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither UMAY nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UMAY vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAY drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAY and BAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UMAYBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-23.91%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-9.19%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.12%

-15.58%

+3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-2.66%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.38%

+0.08%

Volatility

UMAY vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) is 1.69%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that UMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UMAYBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

3.45%

-1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

4.26%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

11.90%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.48%

11.54%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.03%

13.25%

-5.22%