UMAX.TO vs. DXQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UMAX.TO (Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and DXQ.TO (Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UMAX.TO returned 13.44% vs 19.04% for DXQ.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for DXQ.TO.

Performance

UMAX.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) and Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAX.TO achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than DXQ.TO's 6.80% return.

UMAX.TO

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 8.78%
• 6M: 8.52%
• 1Y: 13.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DXQ.TO

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 2.65%
• YTD: 6.80%
• 6M: 5.77%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 17.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMAX.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UMAX.TO Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	8.78%	9.95%	5.97%	0.81%
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF	6.80%	12.99%	21.07%	9.95%

Correlation

The correlation between UMAX.TO and DXQ.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023	0.15

The correlation between UMAX.TO and DXQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UMAX.TO vs. DXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMAX.TO

UMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 58
UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
UMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
UMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
UMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
UMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 53

DXQ.TO

DXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
DXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
DXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAX.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) and Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMAX.TO	DXQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.08	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	2.95	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.40	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	3.74	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.13	10.46	-1.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMAX.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the DXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAX.TO and DXQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMAX.TO	DXQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	2.08	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	1.61	-0.61

Drawdowns

UMAX.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum DXQ.TO drawdown of -15.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAX.TO and DXQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMAX.TO	DXQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.09%	-15.54%	+5.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.11%	-5.11%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.70%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-1.27%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	1.82%	-0.32%

Volatility

UMAX.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) is 1.93%, while Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that UMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMAX.TO	DXQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.93%	2.38%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.54%	7.14%	-1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.65%	9.21%	-2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.68%	10.92%	-2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.68%	10.92%	-2.24%

UMAX.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DXQ.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMAX.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

UMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.00%, more than DXQ.TO's 7.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF	7.77%	7.45%	5.74%	6.54%	1.83%
UMAX.TO Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	14.00%	14.86%	14.81%	6.96%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMAX.TO and DXQ.TO in my portfolio?

UMAX.TO and DXQ.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UMAX.TO or DXQ.TO?

On fees, UMAX.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMAX.TO or DXQ.TO?

UMAX.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for DXQ.TO.

What is the main difference between UMAX.TO and DXQ.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Dynamic. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UMAX.TO and 0.72% for DXQ.TO.