PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMAX.TO vs. AMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UMAX.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) and Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UMAX.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UMAX.TO
Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
4.87%9.95%4.78%
AMAX.TO
Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
4.61%113.79%29.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMAX.TO achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly higher than AMAX.TO's 4.61% return.


UMAX.TO

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
4.87%
6M
5.47%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMAX.TO

1D
5.62%
1M
-18.54%
YTD
4.61%
6M
13.47%
1Y
68.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UMAX.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UMAX.TO and AMAX.TO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Return for Risk

UMAX.TO vs. AMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMAX.TO
UMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAX.TO
AMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMAX.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) and Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMAX.TOAMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.75

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

2.10

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.47

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.59

9.13

-0.54

UMAX.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the AMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMAX.TO and AMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMAX.TOAMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.75

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.96

-1.06

Correlation

The correlation between UMAX.TO and AMAX.TO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UMAX.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

UMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.09%, more than AMAX.TO's 6.91% yield.


TTM202520242023
UMAX.TO
Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
13.09%14.86%14.81%6.96%
AMAX.TO
Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
6.91%7.11%11.22%0.00%

Drawdowns

UMAX.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, smaller than the maximum AMAX.TO drawdown of -28.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMAX.TO and AMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UMAX.TOAMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-28.60%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-28.60%

+22.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-18.54%

+15.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-4.66%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

7.74%

-6.35%

Volatility

UMAX.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) is 2.22%, while Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO) has a volatility of 16.54%. This indicates that UMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UMAX.TOAMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

16.54%

-14.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.78%

33.06%

-28.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.81%

39.73%

-31.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.68%

33.11%

-24.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.68%

33.11%

-24.43%