PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXQ.TO vs. YCST.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXQ.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) and Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXQ.TO achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly lower than YCST.NEO's 10.27% return.


DXQ.TO

1D
1.09%
1M
4.22%
YTD
3.70%
6M
4.51%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
10Y*

YCST.NEO

1D
-0.67%
1M
-4.20%
YTD
10.27%
6M
-2.20%
1Y
-8.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXQ.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DXQ.TO and YCST.NEO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXQ.TO vs. YCST.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXQ.TO
DXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

YCST.NEO
YCST.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
YCST.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCST.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCST.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
YCST.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCST.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXQ.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) and Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXQ.TOYCST.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

-0.44

+3.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

-0.49

+4.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

0.94

+0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.86

-0.39

+6.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.06

-0.71

+16.76

DXQ.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the YCST.NEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXQ.TO and YCST.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXQ.TOYCST.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

-0.44

+3.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

-0.59

+2.17

Drawdowns

DXQ.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.54%, smaller than the maximum YCST.NEO drawdown of -25.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXQ.TO and YCST.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DXQ.TOYCST.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.54%

-25.53%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-24.19%

+19.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.10%

+17.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-13.36%

+12.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

13.19%

-11.32%

Volatility

DXQ.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) is 3.95%, while Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that DXQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCST.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DXQ.TOYCST.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

6.10%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

15.54%

-7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

20.43%

-9.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.04%

23.88%

-12.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.04%

23.88%

-12.84%

DXQ.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXQ.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than YCST.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXQ.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Dividend Comparison

DXQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, while YCST.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
DXQ.TO
Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF
7.67%7.45%5.74%6.54%1.83%
YCST.NEO
Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%