PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULTY vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULTY vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULTY achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.61% return.


ULTY

1D
-0.49%
1M
-1.74%
6M
7.54%
YTD
6.38%
1Y
-7.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.20%

RBIL

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.18%
6M
2.25%
YTD
2.61%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.19M$1.87M$2.26M
$14.52M$14.36M$17.70M

ULTY vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ULTY and RBIL is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULTY vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ULTY
ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ULTY vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULTYRBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

2.00

-1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

6.80

-7.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

27.52

-28.11

ULTY vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTY and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ULTY vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULTY drawdown since its inception was -26.85%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTY and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULTYRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.85%

-0.56%

-26.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.16%

-0.56%

-23.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.78%

-0.22%

-12.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.04%

-0.08%

-9.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.34%

0.14%

+13.20%

Volatility

ULTY vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.28%. This indicates that ULTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULTYRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

0.28%

+6.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.20%

0.89%

+16.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.12%

0.96%

+21.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.07%

1.06%

+26.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.07%

1.06%

+26.01%

ULTY vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULTY has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULTY vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ULTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 112.43%, more than RBIL's 4.16% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ULTY and RBIL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULTY has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to RBIL (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULTY dropped -26.85% vs RBIL's -0.56%.

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 3.81% vs -7.91% for ULTY. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 3.81% return vs -7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for ULTY.

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 112.43%, compared with 4.16% for RBIL.

ULTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and F/m. Their fees differ too: 1.40% for ULTY and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULTY and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer