ULTY vs. GPIQ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ULTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ULTY returned 3.61% vs 33.15% for GPIQ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ULTY charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.

Performance

ULTY vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULTY achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 15.73% return.

ULTY

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: 8.80%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 3.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIQ

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 15.73%
• 6M: 16.33%
• 1Y: 33.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULTY vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF	8.80%	-0.84%	-4.73%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	15.73%	19.77%	16.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ULTY and GPIQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024	0.74

The correlation between ULTY and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

ULTY vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ULTY	GPIQ
Technology	54.6%	53.8%
Basic Materials	11.7%	1.1%
Industrials	9.3%	2.9%
Communication Services	8.9%	15.8%
Financial Services	8.6%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	12.3%
Healthcare	1.8%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

ULTY vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULTY

ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 12
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 81
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 81
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULTY vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ULTY	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	2.29	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	3.00	-2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.42	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	3.50	-3.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.29	14.86	-14.57

ULTY vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTY and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ULTY vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULTY drawdown since its inception was -26.85%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTY and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ULTY	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.85%	-21.06%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.16%	-9.51%	-14.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.79%	-2.35%	-8.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.90%	-2.28%	-7.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.47%	2.24%	+10.23%

Volatility

ULTY vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 6.42%. This indicates that ULTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ULTY	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.04%	6.42%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.40%	11.92%	+4.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.55%	14.53%	+7.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.32%	17.72%	+9.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.32%	17.72%	+9.60%

ULTY vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULTY has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

ULTY vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

ULTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 113.38%, more than GPIQ's 9.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.53%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%
ULTY YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF	113.38%	142.99%	111.70%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ULTY and GPIQ in my portfolio?

ULTY and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ULTY or GPIQ?

ULTY has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to GPIQ (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULTY dropped -26.85% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

Which ETF is better, ULTY or GPIQ?

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 33.15% vs 3.61% for ULTY. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ULTY or GPIQ?

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 33.15% return vs 3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ULTY or GPIQ?

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ULTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ULTY or GPIQ?

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 113.38%, compared with 9.53% for GPIQ.

What is the main difference between ULTY and GPIQ?

ULTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ULTY and 0.29% for GPIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.