PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULTR vs. IWFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ULTR vs. IWFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Ultra Short Duration ETF (ULTR) and NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ULTR vs. IWFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ULTR
IQ Ultra Short Duration ETF
0.00%0.00%1.34%5.48%1.59%
IWFG
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
-12.12%14.33%37.56%38.40%3.75%

Returns By Period


ULTR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWFG

1D
1.14%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
-12.12%
6M
-12.26%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ULTR vs. IWFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFG's 0.46% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ULTR vs. IWFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULTR

IWFG
IWFG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IWFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULTR vs. IWFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Ultra Short Duration ETF (ULTR) and NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ULTR vs. IWFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULTRIWFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

Correlation

The correlation between ULTR and IWFG is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ULTR vs. IWFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ULTR nor IWFG has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ULTR
IQ Ultra Short Duration ETF
0.00%0.00%1.12%4.50%2.43%2.26%1.90%1.03%
IWFG
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%5.44%1.01%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ULTR vs. IWFG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ULTRIWFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

Volatility

ULTR vs. IWFG - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ULTRIWFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.69%