PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULTA vs. TPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ULTA vs. TPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULTA achieves a -23.51% return, which is significantly lower than TPR's 10.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ULTA has underperformed TPR with an annualized return of 6.79%, while TPR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.11% annualized return.


ULTA

1D
-0.91%
1M
-11.27%
YTD
-23.51%
6M
-21.47%
1Y
-0.61%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
6.79%

TPR

1D
0.57%
1M
5.86%
YTD
10.89%
6M
20.82%
1Y
80.77%
3Y*
52.54%
5Y*
29.87%
10Y*
17.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULTA vs. TPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
-23.51%39.11%-11.24%4.46%13.76%43.59%13.44%3.39%9.47%-12.27%
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
10.89%98.73%82.80%0.16%-3.32%32.29%16.86%-15.97%-22.09%30.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ULTA and TPR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2007

0.43

The correlation between ULTA and TPR shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ULTA:

$20.35B

TPR:

$29.35B

EPS

ULTA:

$26.57

TPR:

$3.15

PE Ratio

ULTA:

17.42

TPR:

44.72

PS Ratio

ULTA:

1.63

TPR:

3.78

PB Ratio

ULTA:

7.88

TPR:

43.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

ULTA:

$12.71B

TPR:

$7.85B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ULTA:

$5.00B

TPR:

$5.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

ULTA:

$1.81B

TPR:

$1.06B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULTA vs. TPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULTA
ULTA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ULTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TPR
TPR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULTA vs. TPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULTATPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.36

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

4.23

-4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.05

10.73

-10.78

ULTA vs. TPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULTA Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the TPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTA and TPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULTATPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

1.99

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.75

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.39

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.44

-0.09

Drawdowns

ULTA vs. TPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULTA drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, which is greater than TPR's maximum drawdown of -82.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTA and TPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULTATPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.89%

-82.55%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

-19.21%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.56%

-39.54%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.56%

-41.87%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

-79.06%

+14.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.52%

-11.72%

-22.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.80%

-27.74%

+6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.51%

7.55%

+5.96%

Volatility

ULTA vs. TPR - Volatility Comparison

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) have volatilities of 9.07% and 8.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULTATPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

8.83%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.67%

27.95%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.25%

40.87%

-7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.25%

40.24%

-5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.32%

44.23%

-5.91%

Dividends

ULTA vs. TPR - Dividend Comparison

ULTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
1.14%1.17%2.14%3.53%2.89%1.23%1.09%5.01%3.00%3.06%3.85%4.13%
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ULTA vs. TPR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Tapestry, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.16B
1.92B
(ULTA) Total Revenue
(TPR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ULTA vs. TPR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Tapestry, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
40.1%
76.9%
Portfolio components
ULTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 3.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.

TPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

ULTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 448.26M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

TPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported an operating income of 427.50M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

ULTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 340.47M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

TPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a net income of 343.80M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ULTA and TPR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULTA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to TPR (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULTA dropped -87.89% vs TPR's -82.55%.

TPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULTA and TPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer