ULTA vs. ABG

In the year-to-date period, ULTA achieves a -11.79% return, which is significantly lower than ABG's -8.02% return. Over the past 10 years, ULTA has underperformed ABG with an annualized return of 9.80%, while ABG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.31% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) and Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ULTA Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the ABG Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULTA and ABG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ULTA nor ABG has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ULTA drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, smaller than the maximum ABG drawdown of -92.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULTA and ABG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) is 15.75%, while Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) has a volatility of 16.61%. This indicates that ULTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.