PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULST vs. ICSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULST vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (ULST) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULST achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than ICSH's 1.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ULST having a 2.68% annualized return and ICSH not far ahead at 2.76%.


ULST

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.61%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
2.68%

ICSH

1D
0.03%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.83%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
2.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULST vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULST
State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
1.26%4.80%5.23%5.60%0.87%0.25%1.45%3.23%2.04%1.19%
ICSH
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
1.45%4.96%5.52%5.58%0.97%0.16%1.61%3.17%2.25%1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ULST and ICSH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013

0.16

Over the past year, ULST and ICSH have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULST vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULST
ULST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ULST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ULST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULST Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ICSH
ICSH Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
ICSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSH Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULST vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (ULST) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULSTICSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.23

11.29

-5.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

12.49

28.60

-16.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.82

6.82

-4.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

16.92

44.50

-27.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

87.91

299.13

-211.22

ULST vs. ICSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULST Sharpe Ratio is 6.23, which is lower than the ICSH Sharpe Ratio of 11.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULST and ICSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULSTICSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23

11.29

-5.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.66

7.63

-3.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.86

2.62

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

1.94

-0.44

Drawdowns

ULST vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULST drawdown since its inception was -6.20%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULST and ICSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULSTICSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-3.94%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.24%

-0.10%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.54%

-0.10%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.22%

-0.73%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.20%

-3.94%

-2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.08%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.01%

+0.04%

Volatility

ULST vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison

State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (ULST) has a higher volatility of 0.20% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.16%. This indicates that ULST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULSTICSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

0.16%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.43%

0.30%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65%

0.39%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.96%

0.48%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.45%

1.06%

+0.39%

ULST vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ULST vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison

ULST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICSH
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.34%4.55%5.24%4.78%1.66%0.42%1.21%2.61%2.20%1.36%0.88%0.54%
ULST
State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
4.29%4.46%5.03%4.45%1.70%0.54%1.34%2.56%2.13%1.21%0.93%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULST and ICSH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULST has higher volatility (0.20%) compared to ICSH (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULST dropped -6.20% vs ICSH's -3.94%.

On 10-year performance, ICSH leads with 2.76% vs 2.68% for ULST. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ICSH has performed better with a 2.76% return vs 2.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ULST.

ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 4.29% for ULST.

ULST tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3 Month Index, while ICSH tracks ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULST and 0.08% for ICSH.

ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.29 vs 6.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULST and ICSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer