ULST vs. ICSH
ULST (State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds - ULST tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3 Month Index while ICSH tracks the ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ULST returned 2.68%/yr vs 2.76%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ULST charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for ICSH.
Performance
ULST vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULST achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than ICSH's 1.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ULST having a 2.68% annualized return and ICSH not far ahead at 2.76%.
ULST
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.76%
ULST vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULST State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF | 1.26% | 4.80% | 5.23% | 5.60% | 0.87% | 0.25% | 1.45% | 3.23% | 2.04% | 1.19% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.45% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULST and ICSH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013 | 0.16 |
Over the past year, ULST and ICSH have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULST vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
ULST
ICSH
ULST vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (ULST) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULST | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.23 | 11.29 | -5.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 12.49 | 28.60 | -16.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.82 | 6.82 | -4.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.92 | 44.50 | -27.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 87.91 | 299.13 | -211.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULST | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23 | 11.29 | -5.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.66 | 7.63 | -3.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.86 | 2.62 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 1.94 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
ULST vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULST drawdown since its inception was -6.20%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULST and ICSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULST | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -3.94% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.24% | -0.10% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.54% | -0.10% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.22% | -0.73% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.20% | -3.94% | -2.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.08% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.01% | +0.04% |
Volatility
ULST vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (ULST) has a higher volatility of 0.20% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.16%. This indicates that ULST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULST | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.20% | 0.16% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 0.30% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65% | 0.39% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.96% | 0.48% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.45% | 1.06% | +0.39% |
ULST vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ULST vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
ULST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
ULST State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.46% | 5.03% | 4.45% | 1.70% | 0.54% | 1.34% | 2.56% | 2.13% | 1.21% | 0.93% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULST and ICSH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULST has higher volatility (0.20%) compared to ICSH (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULST dropped -6.20% vs ICSH's -3.94%.
On 10-year performance, ICSH leads with 2.76% vs 2.68% for ULST. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ICSH has performed better with a 2.76% return vs 2.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ULST.
ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 4.29% for ULST.
ULST tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3 Month Index, while ICSH tracks ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULST and 0.08% for ICSH.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.29 vs 6.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULST and ICSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer