PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULST vs. GBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULST vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (ULST) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULST achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 1.42% return.


ULST

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.57%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
2.67%

GBIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.73%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULST vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULST
State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
1.24%4.80%5.23%5.60%0.87%0.25%1.45%3.23%2.04%1.19%
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
1.42%4.12%5.24%4.91%1.05%-0.08%0.79%2.31%1.78%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ULST and GBIL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2016

0.19

The correlation between ULST and GBIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULST vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULST
ULST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ULST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ULST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GBIL
GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULST vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (ULST) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULSTGBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-90.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.77

39.42

-36.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.92

196.43

-179.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

87.49

1,608.66

-1,521.17

ULST vs. GBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULST Sharpe Ratio is 6.14, which is lower than the GBIL Sharpe Ratio of 16.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULST and GBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULSTGBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.14

16.89

-10.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.67

5.78

-2.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

4.87

-3.37

Drawdowns

ULST vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULST drawdown since its inception was -6.20%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULST and GBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULSTGBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-0.76%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.24%

-0.02%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.54%

-0.76%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.22%

-0.76%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.04%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.00%

+0.05%

Volatility

ULST vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison

State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (ULST) has a higher volatility of 0.18% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.04%. This indicates that ULST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULSTGBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

0.04%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.43%

0.14%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65%

0.23%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.96%

0.58%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.45%

0.47%

+0.98%

ULST vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ULST vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

ULST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than GBIL's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
3.74%4.02%4.93%4.77%1.37%0.00%0.81%2.20%1.70%0.74%0.11%0.00%
ULST
State Street Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
4.29%4.46%5.03%4.45%1.70%0.54%1.34%2.56%2.13%1.21%0.93%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULST and GBIL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULST has higher volatility (0.18%) compared to GBIL (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULST dropped -6.20% vs GBIL's -0.76%.

On 5-year performance, ULST leads with 3.51% vs 3.32% for GBIL. On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULST has performed better with a 3.51% return vs 3.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ULST.

ULST has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 3.74% for GBIL.

ULST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GBIL is Government Bonds. ULST tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3 Month Index, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULST and 0.12% for GBIL.

GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.89 vs 6.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULST and GBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer