PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULPIX vs. DXNLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULPIX vs. DXNLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULPIX achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly higher than DXNLX's 12.06% return.


ULPIX

1D
3.31%
1M
-1.63%
6M
11.59%
YTD
14.19%
1Y
34.71%
3Y*
27.77%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
21.47%
ALL TIME*
9.31%

DXNLX

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.32%
6M
10.68%
YTD
12.06%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ULPIX vs. DXNLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
14.19%25.47%38.03%45.59%-39.16%59.28%19.12%62.17%-15.02%42.77%
DXNLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund
12.06%22.13%28.56%66.63%-40.88%32.49%58.90%46.34%-3.37%37.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ULPIX and DXNLX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.90

The correlation between ULPIX and DXNLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULPIX vs. DXNLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ULPIX
ULPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ULPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ULPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DXNLX
DXNLX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DXNLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXNLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXNLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DXNLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXNLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ULPIX vs. DXNLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULPIXDXNLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.41

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.47

4.48

+1.99

ULPIX vs. DXNLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the DXNLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULPIX and DXNLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ULPIX vs. DXNLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.68%, which is greater than DXNLX's maximum drawdown of -43.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULPIX and DXNLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULPIXDXNLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.68%

-43.77%

-45.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.30%

-15.91%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.59%

-28.35%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.92%

-43.77%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.45%

-10.69%

+5.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-8.65%

-25.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

4.99%

-0.43%

Volatility

ULPIX vs. DXNLX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX) have volatilities of 6.90% and 6.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULPIXDXNLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

6.96%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.16%

19.44%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.68%

23.72%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.14%

28.79%

+5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.45%

28.93%

+6.52%

ULPIX vs. DXNLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULPIX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DXNLX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULPIX vs. DXNLX - Dividend Comparison

ULPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than DXNLX's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXNLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund
0.89%2.31%0.17%0.00%0.00%7.43%12.20%0.00%8.79%7.52%
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
7.98%9.11%0.00%0.02%10.36%5.62%12.74%0.42%0.58%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ULPIX and DXNLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DXNLX has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to ULPIX (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULPIX dropped -89.68% vs DXNLX's -43.77%.

ULPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULPIX and DXNLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer