PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULPIX vs. BMPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULPIX vs. BMPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULPIX achieves a 16.02% return, which is significantly lower than BMPIX's 19.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ULPIX has outperformed BMPIX with an annualized return of 23.21%, while BMPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.


ULPIX

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
16.02%
6M
13.77%
1Y
45.84%
3Y*
32.87%
5Y*
17.45%
10Y*
23.21%

BMPIX

1D
0.02%
1M
4.12%
YTD
19.90%
6M
18.12%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULPIX vs. BMPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
16.02%25.47%38.03%45.59%-39.16%59.28%19.12%62.17%-15.02%42.77%
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
19.90%9.09%-5.35%15.30%-16.22%38.93%18.27%25.13%-26.81%34.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ULPIX and BMPIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between ULPIX and BMPIX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULPIX vs. BMPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULPIX
ULPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ULPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ULPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BMPIX
BMPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BMPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BMPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULPIX vs. BMPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULPIXBMPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.53

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.36

4.23

+7.14

ULPIX vs. BMPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the BMPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULPIX and BMPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ULPIX vs. BMPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.68%, which is greater than BMPIX's maximum drawdown of -84.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULPIX and BMPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULPIXBMPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.68%

-84.22%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.30%

-18.38%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.59%

-34.54%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.92%

-38.50%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.41%

-61.41%

+2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-6.20%

+2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.78%

-24.08%

-9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

6.65%

-2.36%

Volatility

ULPIX vs. BMPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) have volatilities of 9.35% and 9.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULPIXBMPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.35%

9.01%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.65%

20.33%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.96%

26.22%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.09%

29.65%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.54%

32.18%

+3.36%

ULPIX vs. BMPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULPIX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BMPIX's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULPIX vs. BMPIX - Dividend Comparison

ULPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than BMPIX's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
1.51%1.81%0.94%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
7.85%9.11%0.00%0.02%10.36%5.62%12.74%0.42%0.58%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULPIX and BMPIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULPIX has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to BMPIX (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULPIX dropped -89.68% vs BMPIX's -84.22%.

ULPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULPIX and BMPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer