PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULE vs. URE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULE vs. URE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULE achieves a -3.77% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 23.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ULE has underperformed URE with an annualized return of -2.46%, while URE has yielded a comparatively higher 3.72% annualized return.


ULE

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
-3.77%
6M
-3.85%
1Y
-1.53%
3Y*
3.78%
5Y*
-3.70%
10Y*
-2.46%

URE

1D
1.83%
1M
9.50%
YTD
23.42%
6M
23.42%
1Y
16.45%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
-3.33%
10Y*
3.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULE vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULE
ProShares Ultra Euro
-3.77%25.97%-11.73%5.08%-15.51%-15.66%14.74%-8.90%-13.40%23.92%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
23.42%-3.65%0.35%11.58%-49.64%88.24%-28.06%57.86%-13.80%16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ULE and URE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008

0.22

The correlation between ULE and URE shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (10 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULE vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULE
ULE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

URE
URE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULE vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULEUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.11

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

0.87

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

2.09

-2.54

ULE vs. URE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULE Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the URE Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULE and URE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ULE vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULE drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULE and URE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULEUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.74%

-97.16%

+24.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-16.50%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.44%

-33.77%

+16.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.01%

-63.66%

+24.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

-70.49%

+19.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.43%

-48.75%

-13.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.08%

-64.49%

+18.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

6.83%

-1.84%

Volatility

ULE vs. URE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) is 2.37%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that ULE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULEUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

9.54%

-7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

20.35%

-11.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

27.52%

-14.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

37.38%

-21.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

40.58%

-25.37%

ULE vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ULE and URE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

ULE vs. URE - Dividend Comparison

ULE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ULE
ProShares Ultra Euro
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
1.90%2.42%2.09%1.32%1.26%0.58%0.94%1.10%1.53%0.93%0.96%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULE and URE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URE has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to ULE (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULE dropped -72.74% vs URE's -97.16%.

On 10-year performance, URE leads with 3.72% vs -2.46% for ULE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, ULE has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, URE has performed better with a 3.72% return vs -2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULE and URE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

URE has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for ULE.

ULE is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while URE is REIT. ULE tracks USD/EUR Exchange Rate (-200%), while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%).

URE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULE and URE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer