ULE vs. FLYD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ULE (ProShares Ultra Euro) and FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - ULE is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/EUR Exchange Rate (-200%), while FLYD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ULE returned 2.30%/yr vs -52.04%/yr for FLYD. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

ULE vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULE achieves a -4.48% return, which is significantly higher than FLYD's -29.08% return.

ULE

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.58%
• 6M: -5.98%
• YTD: -4.48%
• 1Y: -2.43%
• 3Y*: 2.30%
• 5Y*: -3.01%
• 10Y*: -2.49%
• ALL TIME*: -3.95%

FLYD

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: 4.87%
• 6M: -35.29%
• YTD: -29.08%
• 1Y: -48.77%
• 3Y*: -52.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -62.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	$95.69K	$124.77K	$139.75K
ULE ProShares Ultra Euro	$30.31K	$35.90K	$64.55K

ULE vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ULE ProShares Ultra Euro	-4.48%	25.97%	-11.73%	5.08%	0.21%
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-29.08%	-60.42%	-54.13%	-75.14%	-46.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ULE and FLYD is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	-0.20

Return for Risk

ULE vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ULE

ULE Risk / Return Rank: 11
ULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
ULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
ULE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
ULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
ULE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FLYD

FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 4
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ULE vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ULE	FLYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	-0.59	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	-0.53	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	0.94	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.05	-0.81	+0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.09	-1.51	+1.60

ULE vs. FLYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULE Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is higher than the FLYD Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULE and FLYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ULE vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULE drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, smaller than the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULE and FLYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ULE	FLYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.74%	-98.49%	+25.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-56.11%	+44.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.95%	-94.73%	+77.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.71%	-98.36%	+35.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.20%	-83.63%	+37.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.15%	30.18%	-24.03%

Volatility

ULE vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) is 2.55%, while MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a volatility of 21.84%. This indicates that ULE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ULE	FLYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	21.84%	-19.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.19%	64.55%	-56.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.54%	76.98%	-64.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.07%	83.54%	-67.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.07%	83.54%	-68.47%

ULE vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ULE and FLYD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

ULE vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison

Neither ULE nor FLYD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ULE and FLYD in my portfolio?

ULE and FLYD have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ULE or FLYD?

FLYD has higher volatility (21.84%) compared to ULE (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULE dropped -72.74% vs FLYD's -98.49%.

Which ETF is better, ULE or FLYD?

On 3-year performance, ULE leads with 2.30% vs -52.04% for FLYD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, ULE has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ULE or FLYD?

Over the 3-year period, ULE has performed better with a 2.30% return vs -52.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ULE or FLYD?

ULE and FLYD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ULE or FLYD?

ULE and FLYD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ULE and FLYD?

ULE is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while FLYD is Inverse Equities. ULE tracks USD/EUR Exchange Rate (-200%), while FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and REX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ULE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.