ULE vs. AAPX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ULE (ProShares Ultra Euro) and AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ULE is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/EUR Exchange Rate (-200%), while AAPX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. ULE is passively managed, while AAPX is actively managed. Over the past year, ULE returned -2.43% vs 95.96% for AAPX. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ULE charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for AAPX.

Performance

ULE vs. AAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULE achieves a -4.48% return, which is significantly lower than AAPX's 16.24% return.

ULE

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.58%
• 6M: -5.98%
• YTD: -4.48%
• 1Y: -2.43%
• 3Y*: 2.30%
• 5Y*: -3.01%
• 10Y*: -2.49%
• ALL TIME*: -3.95%

AAPX

• 1D: -14.30%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: 29.95%
• YTD: 16.24%
• 1Y: 95.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	$2.16M	$2.04M	$2.19M
ULE ProShares Ultra Euro	$30.31K	$35.90K	$64.55K

ULE vs. AAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ULE ProShares Ultra Euro	-4.48%	25.97%	-10.71%
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	16.24%	-4.95%	58.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ULE and AAPX is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.12

Return for Risk

ULE vs. AAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ULE

ULE Risk / Return Rank: 11
ULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
ULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
ULE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
ULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
ULE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

AAPX

AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 69
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ULE vs. AAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ULE	AAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	1.65	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	2.19	-2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.30	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.05	2.84	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.09	6.44	-6.35

ULE vs. AAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULE Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the AAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULE and AAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ULE vs. AAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULE drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than AAPX's maximum drawdown of -58.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULE and AAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ULE	AAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.74%	-58.55%	-14.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-30.12%	+18.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.71%	-17.43%	-45.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.20%	-18.64%	-27.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.15%	13.26%	-7.11%

Volatility

ULE vs. AAPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE) is 2.55%, while T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) has a volatility of 23.02%. This indicates that ULE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ULE	AAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	23.02%	-20.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.19%	41.47%	-33.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.54%	51.78%	-39.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.07%	55.83%	-39.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.07%	55.83%	-40.76%

ULE vs. AAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ULE vs. AAPX - Dividend Comparison

ULE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	0.57%	0.67%	21.46%
ULE ProShares Ultra Euro	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ULE and AAPX in my portfolio?

ULE and AAPX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ULE or AAPX?

AAPX has higher volatility (23.02%) compared to ULE (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULE dropped -72.74% vs AAPX's -58.55%.

Which ETF is better, ULE or AAPX?

On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 95.96% vs -2.43% for ULE. On fees, ULE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ULE has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ULE or AAPX?

Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 95.96% return vs -2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ULE or AAPX?

ULE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ULE or AAPX?

AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for ULE.

What is the main difference between ULE and AAPX?

ULE is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while AAPX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ULE and 1.05% for AAPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.