PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UJB vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UJB vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UJB (ProShares Ultra High Yield) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - UJB is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UJB returned 6.36%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UJB charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

UJB vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UJB achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Over the past 10 years, UJB has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 6.36%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.

UJB

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.28%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
6.36%

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UJB vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UJB
ProShares Ultra High Yield		0.81%12.22%9.41%17.70%-23.27%6.96%5.19%26.68%-6.08%11.77%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UJB and BNO is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2011

0.13

The correlation between UJB and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.36 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Ultra High Yield

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with UJB:
UJB vs. VOOUJB vs. TYDUJB vs. RISRUJB vs. SPYUJB vs. TQQQUJB vs. UPROUJB vs. SPHY
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

UJB vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UJB
UJB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
UJB Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
UJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
UJB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UJB vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UJBBNODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

2.23

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

2.73

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

5.17

-3.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.20

9.76

-2.56

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UJB vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UJB Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UJB and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UJBBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.23

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.69

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.37

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.14

+0.19

Drawdowns

UJB vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UJB drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UJB and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UJBBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-87.06%

+46.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.01%

-17.87%

+12.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.47%

-23.75%

+14.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.14%

-33.70%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

-75.18%

+35.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-10.29%

+9.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-40.17%

+34.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

9.45%

-8.28%

Volatility

UJB vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) is 2.29%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that UJB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UJBBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

14.22%

-11.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.76%

36.10%

-30.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.29%

41.46%

-34.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

35.38%

-20.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

36.68%

-18.40%

UJB vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UJB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

UJB vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

UJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UJB
ProShares Ultra High Yield		3.35%2.61%3.02%3.92%0.05%0.63%2.88%3.95%3.22%2.67%2.35%3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

UJB and BNO have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to UJB (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UJB dropped -40.14% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.60% vs 6.36% for UJB. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, UJB has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UJB.

UJB has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

UJB is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. UJB tracks Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UJB and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UJB and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer