PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UJAN vs. FFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UJAN vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - January (UJAN) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UJAN achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.11% return.


UJAN

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.83%
YTD
4.72%
6M
5.57%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
12.23%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*

FFTY

1D
-0.14%
1M
7.67%
YTD
20.11%
6M
21.02%
1Y
38.14%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UJAN vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - January
4.72%11.07%13.13%15.89%-5.95%5.79%7.37%10.23%
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
20.11%23.38%18.36%12.40%-51.08%11.92%18.20%26.94%

Correlation

The correlation between UJAN and FFTY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.68

The correlation between UJAN and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

UJAN vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UJAN
FFTY

Technology

36.2%
24.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
13.1%

Communication Services

10.9%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.8%

Healthcare

8.4%
12.1%

Industrials

8.1%
26.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
8.0%

Utilities

2.3%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
21.6%

Technology

UJAN
36.2%
FFTY
24.8%

Financial Services

UJAN
11.9%
FFTY
13.1%

Communication Services

UJAN
10.9%
FFTY
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

UJAN
10.1%
FFTY
4.8%

Healthcare

UJAN
8.4%
FFTY
12.1%

Industrials

UJAN
8.1%
FFTY
26.6%

Consumer Defensive

UJAN
4.9%
FFTY

-

Energy

UJAN
3.5%
FFTY
8.0%

Utilities

UJAN
2.3%
FFTY
2.1%

Real Estate

UJAN
1.9%
FFTY

-

Basic Materials

UJAN
1.8%
FFTY
21.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UJAN vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UJAN
UJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
UJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
UJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
UJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
UJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UJAN vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - January (UJAN) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UJANFFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.20

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.65

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.50

4.36

+15.14

UJAN vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UJAN and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UJANFFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

1.12

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

-0.02

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.20

+0.96

Drawdowns

UJAN vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UJAN drawdown since its inception was -13.69%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UJAN and FFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UJANFFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.69%

-59.46%

+45.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.98%

-23.29%

+19.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.03%

-29.60%

+20.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.03%

-59.46%

+50.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-15.34%

+15.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-22.38%

+20.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

8.77%

-8.03%

Volatility

UJAN vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - January (UJAN) is 0.87%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that UJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UJANFFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

9.42%

-8.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

26.18%

-22.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.18%

34.09%

-28.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

29.14%

-22.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.09%

27.41%

-20.32%

UJAN vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

UJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

UJAN vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

UJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
1.12%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%
UJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UJAN and FFTY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFTY has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to UJAN (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UJAN dropped -13.69% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

On 5-year performance, UJAN leads with 7.97% vs -0.60% for FFTY. On fees, UJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, UJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UJAN has performed better with a 7.97% return vs -0.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for UJAN.

UJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. UJAN tracks S&P 500 Index, while FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UJAN and 0.80% for FFTY.

UJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UJAN and FFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer