UIVM vs. CSHP
UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UIVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. UIVM is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, UIVM returned 31.33% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. UIVM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
UIVM vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.83% return.
UIVM
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 31.33%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.92%
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIVM vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 13.45% | 45.47% | -3.98% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.83% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIVM and CSHP is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | -0.01 |
The correlation between UIVM and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIVM vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
UIVM
CSHP
UIVM vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UIVM | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -24.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 6.46 | -5.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 65.45 | -62.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | 381.67 | -371.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UIVM vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIVM | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.73% | -0.08% | -42.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -0.06% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -0.04% | -2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -0.00% | -9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 0.01% | +3.02% |
Volatility
UIVM vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that UIVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIVM | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 0.16% | +5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.45% | 0.27% | +13.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.34% | 0.36% | +14.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 0.41% | +15.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 0.41% | +16.84% |
UIVM vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIVM vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 3.07% | 3.70% | 5.09% | 4.35% | 3.03% | 3.48% | 1.63% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIVM and CSHP have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UIVM has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, UIVM leads with 31.33% vs 3.94% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UIVM has performed better with a 31.33% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UIVM.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.07% for UIVM.
UIVM is categorized as Momentum, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UIVM and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer