UITB vs. VTG
UITB (VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF) and VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. UITB is actively managed, while VTG is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UITB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTG.
Performance
UITB vs. VTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UITB achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's -0.11% return.
UITB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- —
VTG
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -0.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UITB vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 0.17% | 3.42% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | -0.11% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between UITB and VTG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UITB vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank
UITB
VTG
UITB vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UITB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UITB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.88 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
UITB vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UITB drawdown since its inception was -17.02%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UITB and VTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UITB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -2.89% | -14.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -1.89% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -0.73% | -3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility
UITB vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UITB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 3.51% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.64% | 3.51% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 3.51% | +1.47% |
UITB vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UITB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
UITB vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison
UITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than VTG's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.89% | 3.14% | 2.32% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 3.01% | 2.99% | 0.50% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 3.21% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, UITB and VTG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for UITB.
UITB has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 3.21% for VTG.
They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for UITB and 0.03% for VTG.
Find the right allocation for UITB and VTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer